Hemşirelikte Beceri Gelişiminde E-Öğrenme Sistemlerinin Kullanımına İlişkin Bir Ölçüm Aracının Geliştirilmesi ve Öğrenci Görüşlerinin Belirlenmesi

Author :  

Year-Number: 2022-2
Yayımlanma Tarihi: 2022-08-17 18:04:35.0
Language : İngilizce
Konu : İç Hastalıkları Hemşireliği
Number of pages: 39-61
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışma, e-öğrenmede Hemşirelik Beceri Gelişimi Değerlendirme Aracı (E-NSDAT) geliştirmek ve hemşirelik öğrencilerine göre e-öğrenmenin beceri gelişimine katkısını değerlendirmek amacıyla tasarlanmıştır.

Yöntem: Metodolojik ve tanımlayıcı türdeki olan bu çalışmanın örneklemini Türkiye'deki 469 hemşirelik öğrencisi oluşturmuştur. Veriler anket formu ve E-NSDAT kullanılarak toplanmıştır.

Bulgular: Faktör analizi sonuçlarına göre E-NSDAT'ın 1 faktörden oluştuğu ve bu faktörün toplam varyansın %70'ini açıkladığı belirlenmiştir. Ölçeğin cronbach alfa değeri 0.96'dır. Öğrencilerin E-NSDAT ölçeğinden aldıkları ortalama puan 42.16±13.50'dir. Öğrencilerin e-öğrenmeyi beceri geliştirme üzerinde orta düzeyde etkili buldukları belirlenmiştir.

Sonuç: e-NSDAT, öğrencilerin e-öğrenmede beceri geliştirme düzeylerini ölçmek için geçerli ve güvenilirdir.

Keywords

Abstract

Aim: In any learning experience, it is very important to understand not only one’s strengths and weaknesses, their increase in knowledge and attitude, but also how the learning experience contributes to the improvement of the intended skill. This study was designed to develop the Nursing Skill Development Assessment Instrument in e-learning (e-NSDAI) and investigate the contribution of e-learning to skill development according to nursing students.

Methods: This study was methodological and descriptive. The study was conducted with 469 nursing students in Turkey. Data were collected using an Introductory Information Form and E-NSDAI.

Results: According to the factor analysis results, factor 1 of E-NSDAI explained 70% of the total variance. The Cronbach’s alpha value of the scale was found as 0.96. The mean E-NSDAI score of the participants was determined as 42.16±13.50.

Conclusion: The e-NSDAI is a valid and reliable instrument to measure students' levels of skill development in e-learning. The participants found e-learning to be moderately effective on skill development.

Keywords


  • 1. Akın Korhan E, Uzelli Yilmaz D, Ceylan B, Akbiyik A, Tokem Y. Scenario Based Teaching in Nursing Psychomotor Skills Education: Sharing of an Experience. İzmir Katip Çelebi University Faculty of Health Science Journal 2018;3(3):11-16.

  • 2. Karadeniz KO, Elmas S. Clinical education in nursing. Eurasian Journal of Health Sciences 2021;4(2):132-137.

  • 3. Yıldırım D, Ozer Z, Kocaagalar E, Pinar Boluktas R. Innovation in Education: simulation usage in health education. Journal of Knowledge Economy and Knowledge Management 2019;14(1):33-41

  • 4. McDonald EW, Boulton JL, Davis JL. E-learning and nursing assessment skills and knowledge–An integrative review. Nurse Education Today 2018;66:166-174.

  • 5. Rose S. Medical student education in the time of COVID-19. Jama 2020;323(21):2131- 2132. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.5227

  • 6. Kumar S. Awareness, benefits and challenges of e-learning among the students of Kurukshetra University Kurukshetra: A study. International Journal of Information Dissemination and Technology 2018;8(4):227-230.

  • 7. Keis O, Grab C, Schneider A, Öchsner W. Online or face-to-face instruction? A qualitative study on the electrocardiogram course at the University of Ulm to examine why students choose a particular format. BMC Medical Education 2017;17(1):1-8.

  • 8. Thanji M, Vasantha S. ICT factors influencing consumer adoption of ecommerce offerings for education. Indian Journal of Science and Technology 2016;9(32):1-6.

  • 9. Council of Higher Education (CoHE), Press release 26.03.2020 Avaible at: https://www.yok.gov.tr/Sayfalar/Haberler/2020/YKS%20Ertelenmesi%20Bas%C4%B1n %20A%C3%A7%C4%B1klamas%C4%B1.aspx

  • 10. Thapa P, Bhandari SL, Pathak S. Nursing students’ attitude on the practice of e-learning: A cross-sectional survey amid COVID-19 in Nepal. PloS one 2021;16(6):e0253651.

  • 11. Singh HK, Joshi A, Malepati RN, Najeeb S, Balakrishna P, Pannerselvam NK, Ganne P. A survey of E-learning methods in nursing and medical education during COVID-19 pandemic in India. Nurse education today 2021;99:104796.

  • 12. Bdair IA. Nursing students' and faculty members' perspectives about online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. Teaching and Learning in Nursing 2021;16(3):220-3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2021.02.008

  • 13. Cho JI, Hamash K, Otani K, Reimer N, Deng Y. Influential factors of student evaluations of teaching in a nursing program. Teaching and Learning in Nursing 2018;13(2):86-94.

  • 14. Abuatiq A. E-learning in nursing: Tool development for evaluating virtual patient learning systems. Teaching and Learning in Nursing2019;14(4):291-297.

  • 15. Mahasneh D, Shoqirat N, Singh C, Hawks M. “From the classroom to Dr. YouTube”: nursing students' experiences of learning and teaching styles in Jordan. Teaching and Learning in Nursing 2021;16(1):5-9.

  • 16. Skelcher C, Sullivan H, Jeffares S. Hybrid governance in European cities: Neighbourhood, migration and democracy. Springer, 2013.

  • 17. Lundberg A, de Leeuw R, Aliani R. Using Q methodology: Sorting out subjectivity in educational research. Educational Research Review 2020;31: 100361. Doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100361.

  • 18. Erkus A. Scientific research spiral. Ankara: Seckin Publications, 2005 (in Turkish).

  • 19. Guris S, Astar M.Statistics with SPSS. 2nd ed. Istanbul: Der Publications 2015;415-7 (in Turkish).

  • 20. Alpar R. Applied statistics and examples with validity-reliability from sports, health and education sciences. 3rd ed. Ankara: Detay Publications 2014;434-85.

  • 21. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics (Sixth Edition). USA: Pearson Education Limited, 2013.

  • 22. Stevens JP. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (Fourth Edition). New Jersey: Lawrance Erlbaum Association, 2002.

  • 23. Thorne CJ, Lockey AS, Bullock I, Hampshire S, Begum-Ali S, Perkins GD. E-learning in advanced life support–an evaluation by the Resuscitation Council (UK). Resuscitation 2015;90:79-84.

  • 24. Harerimana A, Mtshali NG. Conceptualisation of e-learning in nursing education in the context of Rwanda. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice 2020;10(6):26.

  • 25. Subedi S, Nayaju S, Subedi S, Shah SK, Shah JM. Impact of E-learning during COVID- 19 pandemic among nursing students and teachers of Nepal. International Journal of Science and Healthcare Research 2020;5(3):68-76.

  • 26. Adams N. Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives. J. Med. Libr. Assoc. 2015;103(3):152.

  • 27. Ramos-Morcillo AJ, Leal-Costa C, Moral-García JE, Ruzafa-Martínez M. Experiences of nursing students during the abrupt change from face-to-face to e-learning education during the first month of confinement due to COVID-19 in Spain. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020;17(15):5519.

  • 28. Mukhtar K, Javed K, Arooj M, Sethi A. Advantages, Limitations and Recommendations for online learning during COVID-19 pandemic era. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences 2020;36(COVID19-S4): S27.

  • 29. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Education, Fatih Project. (2020). Avaible at: http://fatihprojesi.meb.gov.tr/

  • 30. Forbes H, Oprescu FI, Downer T, Phillips NM, McTier L, Lord B, Visser I. Use of videos to support teaching and learning of clinical skills in nursing education: A review. Nurse Education Today 2016;42:53-56.

  • 31. Martinengo L, Yeo NJY, Tang ZQ, Kasturi D, Markandran O, Kyaw BM, Car LT. Digital education for the management of chronic wounds in health care professionals: protocol for a systematic review by the Digital Health Education Collaboration. JMIR Research Protocols 2019;8(3):e12488.

  • 32. Vogel D, Harendza S. Basic practical skills teaching and learning in undergraduate medical education–a review on methodological evidence. GMS Journal for Medical Education 2016;33(4):33-39.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics