Doğum Ünitelerinde Ergonomi: Riskler, Etkiler ve Öneriler

Author :  

Year-Number: 2020-1
Yayımlanma Tarihi: 2020-12-11 13:29:59.0
Language : Türkçe
Konu : Hemşirelik - Kadın Doğum Hemşireliği
Number of pages: 25-45
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Sağlık kurumları özellikle hastaneler çalışma ortamından kaynaklanan çeşitli tehlikelere sahip karmaşık yapılardır. Bu sistem içerisinde doğum üniteleri ise fiziksel, bilişsel ve örgütsel ergonomik risk faktörlerinin fazla olduğu birimler arasında yer almaktadır. Bununla birlikte bu birimlerde ergonomi genellikle göz ardı edilmektedir. Doğum ünitelerinde ergonomik risk faktörlerine maruziyet sağlık çalışanlarında; kas iskelet sistemi ile ilgili yakınmalara, iş kazalarına, malpraktise, tükenmişliğe ve mesleği bırakma gibi problemlere neden olmaktadır. Bununla birlikte doğum ünitelerinin ergonomik tasarımı gebelerin doğuma ilişkin memnuniyetlerini de etkilemektedir. Doğum ünitelerinde ergonomik çalışma koşullarının sağlanması ve oda tasarımlarının geliştirilmesi ile hem sağlık çalışanlarının yaşam kalitesi ve verimliliği artıracak, hem de kadınların olumlu doğum deneyimi yaşamalarına katkıda bulunulacaktır. Bu nedenle bu ünitelerde ergonomik risklerin bilinmesi, önlemlerin alınması ve çalışan sağlığını korumaya yönelik stratejilerin geliştirilmesi önemlidir.

Keywords

Abstract

Healthcare institutions, especially hospitals, are complex structures with various dangers arising from the working environment. In this system, delivery units are among the units with high physical, cognitive and organizational ergonomic risk factors. However, ergonomics is generally overlooked in these units. Exposure to ergonomic risk factors in maternity units causes problems such as musculoskeletal complaints, occupational accidents, malpractice, burnout and leaving the profession in healthcare professionals. However, the ergonomic design of the delivery units also affects the satisfaction of the pregnant women regarding the birth. Providing ergonomic working conditions in delivery units and improving room designs will increase the quality of life and productivity of healthcare professionals and contribute to the positive birth experience of women. For this reason, it is important to know the ergonomic risks in these units, to take precautions and to develop strategies to protect employee health.

Keywords


  • 1. Güler Ç. Ergonomi Tanımı. İçinde: Güler Ç, editör. Sağlık Boyutuyla Ergonomi Hekim ve Mühendisler İçin. Ankara: Palme Yayıncılık; 2004. s. 1- 3.

  • 2. İlçe A. Study on work-related musculoskeletal disorders in intensive care unit nurses.Anatolian Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2014; 8(2): 68-76. Available from:http://eds.a.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=0&sid=c8936475-1f0f-4eaf-aad5- 6fb8515989e2%40sdc-v-sessmgr03

  • 4. Saygun M. Sağlık çalışanlarında iş sağlığı ve güvenliği sorunları. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin. 2012; 11(4): 373–82. doi: 10.5455/pmb.1319955395.

  • 5. Ndejjo R, Musinguzi G, Yu X, Buregyeya E, Musoke D, Wang J-S, et al. Occupationalhealth hazards among healthcare workers in Kampala, Uganda. Journal of Environmental and Public Health. 2015; 2015: 913741. doi: 10.1155/2015/913741.

  • 6. Alparslan Babayiğit M, Kurt M. Hastane ergonomisi. Istanbul Medical Journal. 2013; 14(3): 153–59. doi: 10.5152/imj.2013.42.

  • 7. Azizoğlu F, Köse A, Gül H. Self-reported environmental health risks of nurses working inhospital surgical units. International Nursing Review. 2019; 66(1): 87–93. doi: 10.1111/inr.12467.

  • 8. Gürer A. Sağlık hizmetlerinde çalışan güvenliği. Journal of Health Services and Education. 2018; 2(1): 9-14. doi: 10.26567/JOHSE.2018142107.

  • 9. Kırılmaz H, Yorgun S., Atasoy A. Sağlık çalışanlarında psikososyal risk faktörlerinibelirlemeye yönelik bir araştırma. International Journal of Cultural and Social Studies. 2016; 2(1): 66-82. Available from: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/intjcss/issue/25850/272499

  • 10. Liu J, Zhu B, Wu J, Mao Y. Job satisfaction, work stress, and turnover intentions amongrural health workers: a cross-sectional study in 11 western provinces of China. BMC Family Practice. 2019; 20(1): 9. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0904-0.

  • 11. Abdul Rahman H, Abdul-Mumin K, Naing L. Psychosocial work stressors, work fatigue,and musculoskeletal disorders: comparison between emergency and critical care nurses inBrunei Public Hospitals. Asian Nursing Research. 2017; 11(1): 13-18. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2017.01.003.

  • 12. Ogunlana MO, Awobayo AO, Ayodeji AF, Oyewole OO. Work and musculoskeletaldiscomfort of Nigerian health workers: pattern and predictors. Physical Therapy Reviews.2019;24(6):389–93. doi: 10.1080/10833196.2019.1662208.

  • 13. Ganiyu SO, Olabode JA, Stanley MM, Muhammad I. Patterns of occurrence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders and its correlation with ergonomic hazards among health careprofessionals. Nigerian Journal of Experimental and Clinical Biosciences. 2015; 3:18-23. doi: 10.4103/2348-0149.158153.

  • 14. Arsalani N, Lagerström M, Fallahi-Khoshknab M, Josephson M. Musculoskeletaldisorders and working conditions among iranian nursing personnel. International Journal ofOccupational Safety and Ergonomics. 2014;20(4):671–80. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2014.11077073.

  • 15. Mehrdad R, Dennerlein JT, Morshedizadeh M. musculoskeletal disorders and ergonomichazards among Iranian physicians. Archives of Iranian Medıcıne. 2012;15(6):370–4. Availablefrom: http://eds.b.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=d4c1a330-d4f5-4db2- a9bc-2403bd28b562%40pdc-v-sessmgr06

  • 16. Akçapınar M, İnceboz T. Doğumhanede meslek hastalıkları ve nedenleri: İzmir Örneği.Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2016; 30(1): 1-8. Available from: https://www.journalagent.com/deutip/pdfs/DEUTFD_30_1_1_8.pdf

  • 17. Hammond A, Homer CSE, Foureur M. Friendliness, functionality and freedom: Designcharacteristics that support midwifery practice in the hospital setting. Midwifery. 2017; 50:133– 8. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.03.025.

  • 18. Hammond A, Foureur M, Homer CSE. The hardware and software implications of hospitalbirth room design: A midwifery perspective. Midwifery. 2014; 30(7):825–30. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.07.013.

  • 19. Hignett S. Manual handling risks in midwifery: identification of risk factors. British Journal of Midwifery. 1996; 4(11): 590-6. doi: 10.12968/bjom.1996.4.11.590.

  • 20. Stichler JF, Feiler JL, Chase K. Understanding risks of workplace injury in labor anddelivery. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing. 2012; 41(1): 71-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2011.01308.x.

  • 21. Nowotny-Czupryna O, Naworska B, Brzęk A, Nowotny J, Famuła A, Kmita B, et al.Professional experience and ergonomic aspects of midwives’ work. International Journal ofOccupational Medicine and Environmental Health 2012;25(3):265. doi: 10.2478/S13382-012- 0034-6.

  • 22. Okuyucu K, Hignett S, Gyi D, Doshani A. Midwives’ thoughts about musculoskeletaldisorders with an evaluation of working tasks. Applied ergonomics.2020;90:103263. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103263.

  • 23. Munabi IG, Buwembo W, Kitara DL, Ochieng J, Mwaka ES. Musculoskeletal disorder riskfactors among nursing professionals in low resource settings: a cross-sectional study in Uganda. BMC Nursing. 2014;13(1):1-8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6955-13-7.

  • 24. Okuyucu K, Hignett S, Gyi D, Doshani A. Musculoskeletal symptoms in midwives andwork-related contributory risk factors. In: Bagnara S, Tartaglia R, Albolino S, Alexander T,Fujita Y, editors. Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association(IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Springer, Cham;2019; 820: 54-9. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-96083-8_8.

  • 25. Borres RD, Javier, AK. An Ergonomic design of birthing chair for public maternityhospitals in the Philippines. 2019;2463-9. Available from: http://www.ieomsociety.org/ieom2019/papers/548.pdf

  • 26. Okuyucu KA, Jewe Y, Doshani A. Work-related musculoskeletal injuries amongstobstetrics and gynaecology trainees in East Midland region of the UK. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2017; 296(3): 489-94. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4449-y.

  • 27. Bahk JW, Kim H, Jung-Choi K, Jung MC, Lee I. Relationship between prolonged standingand symptoms of varicose veins and nocturnal leg cramps among women and men. Ergonomics. 2012;55(2):133–9. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2011.582957.

  • 28. Nevala N, Ketola R. Birthing support for midwives and mothers-ergonomic testing andproduct development. The Ergonomics Open Journal. 2012; 5(1). 28-34. doi: 10.2174/1875934301205010028.

  • 29. Akçapınar M. İş sağlığı ve güvenliği kapsamında kalite yönetimi uygulanan hastanelerindoğumhanelerinde çalışan güvenliği ve çalışan güvenliğini etkileyen nedenler. [Yüksek Lisans tezi]. İzmir: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 2015.

  • 30. Rohrich RJ. Why I hate the headlight ... and other ways to protect your cervical spine.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2001;107(4):1037–8. Available from:file:///C:/Users/Lenovo/Downloads/Why_I_Hate_the_Headlight___and_Other_Ways_to.21% 20(3).pdf

  • 31. Dinç A, Aşkın A. Determining ergonomic risks and hazards in delivery rooms. Journal ofAwareness. 2018;3(5):59-68. Available from: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article- file/659596

  • 32. Chandraharan E, Arulkumaran S. Medico-legal problems in obstetrics. Current Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2006;16(4):206–10. doi: 10.1016/j.curobgyn.2006.05.003.

  • 33. Akçapınar M, İnceboz T. Doğumhanelerde çalışan güvenliği ve çalışan güvenliğinietkileyen nedenler. Balıkesir Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2016; 5(3):110-5. doi: 10.5505/bsbd.2016.33600.

  • 34. De La Fuente-Solana E, Suleiman-Martos N, Pradas-Hernandez L, Gomez-Urquiza J,Canadas-De La Fuente G, Albendin-Garcia L. Prevalence, related factors, and levels of burnoutsyndrome among nurses working in gynecology and obstetrics services: A systematic reviewand meta-analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2019; 16(14): 2585. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16142585.

  • 35. Samir N, Mohamed R, Moustafa E, Abou Saif H. Nurses' attitudes and reactions toworkplace violence in obstetrics and gynaecology departments in Cairo hospitals. EMHJ-Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 2012; 18(3):198-204. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/118295

  • 36. Bernal D, Campos-Serna J, Vargas-Prada S, Benavides FG, Serra C, Tobias A. Workrelated psychosocial risk factors and musculoskeletal disorders in hospital nurses and nursingaides: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2015;52(2):635–48. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.11.003.

  • 37. Smith DR, Wei N, Zhao L, Wang RS. Musculoskeletal complaints and psychosocial riskfactors among Chinese hospital nurses. Occupational Medicine. 2004;54(8):579–82. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqh117.

  • 38. Haftu M, Girmay A, Gebremeskel M, Aregawi G, Gebregziabher D, Robles C. Commonlymissed nursing cares in the obstetrics and gynecologic wards of Tigray general hospitals;Northern Ethiopia. Plos One. 2019; 14(12): e0225814. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225814.

  • 39. Öztürk M, Alan S, Kadıoğlu S. Doğumhanede tıp etiği: bir alan çalışması. Çukurova Medical Journal. 2019; 44(1):183-94. doi: 10.17826/cumj.440675.

  • 40. Türkmen H, Ektı̇ Genç R. Ebelik ve yenidoğanda malpraktis. Anadolu Hemşirelik veSağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2017; 20(2):154-9. Available from: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/348671

  • 41. Curtis P, Bally L, Kirkham M. Why do midwives leave? (Not) being the kind of midwifeyou want to be. British Journal of Midwifery. 2006; 14(1):27-31. doi: 10.12968/bjom.2006.14.1.20257.

  • 42. Behruzi R, Klam S, Dehertog M, Jimenez V, Hatem M. Understanding factors affectingcollaboration between midwives and other health care professionals in a birth center and itsaffiliated Quebec hospital: a case study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2017; 17(1):1-14. doi:10.1186/s12884-017-1381-x.

  • 43. Çağlayan Ç, Karaca E. Ergonomi ve kadın işçiler. Mesleki Sağlık ve Güvenlik Dergisi.2015; 15(57):24-28. Available from: file:///C:/Users/Lenovo/Downloads/536-2072-1- PB%20(2).pdf

  • 44. Clements-Croome D. Creative and productive workplaces: a review. Intelligent BuildingsInternational.2015;7(4):164–83. doi: 10.1080/17508975.2015.1019698.

  • 45. Nilsson C. The delivery room: Is it a safe place? A hermeneutic analysis of women’snegative birth experiences. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare. 2014;5(4):199–204. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2014.09.010.

  • 46. Setola N, Naldi E, Cocina GG, Eide LB, Iannuzzi L, Daly D. The impact of the physicalenvironment on intrapartum maternity care: identification of eight crucial building spaces.Health Environments Research and Design Journal. 2019; 12(4):67–98. doi. 10.1177%2F1937586719826058.

  • 47. Nielsen JH, Overgaard C. Healing architecture and Snoezelen in delivery room design: aqualitative study of women’s birth experiences and patient-centeredness of care. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2020; 20(1):1-11. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02983-z.

  • 48. Hussein SAAA, Dahlen HG, Ogunsiji O, Schmied V. Jordanian women’s experiences andconstructions of labour and birth in different settings, over time and across generations: aqualitative study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2020; 20(1):1-15. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020- 03034-3.

  • 49. Yıldırım G. Kadınların normal doğum sürecinde vajinal muayeneye ilişkin deneyimleri veetkileyen faktörler [Yüksek Lisans tezi]. Bolu: Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 2018.

  • 50. Gedey S. Labor-delivery recovery room design that facilitates non − pharmacologicalreduction of labor pain. Res J. 2014;6(1):127–139. Available from:https://www.brikbase.org/sites/default/files/PWRJ_Vol0601_07_Labor_Delivery_Recovery_ Room_Design.pdf

  • 51. Bilgin NÇ. Ergonomics in delivery rooms and its importance. İn: Çamlı AA, Ak B, ArabacıR, Efe R, editors. Recent Advances in Health Sciences. St. Kliment Ohridski Unıversity Press Sofia; 2016. p. 175-82.

  • 52. Jenkinson B, Josey N, Kruske S. Birth Space: An evidence-based guide to birthenvironment design. Queensland, Australia: Queensland Centre for Mothers & Babies, TheUniversity of Queensland; 2013. Available from: https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:339451

  • 53. Townsend B, Fenwick J, Thomson V, Foureur M. The birth bed: A qualitative study on theviews of midwives regarding the use of the bed in the birth space. Women & Birth. 2016; 29(1):80–4. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.08.009.

  • 54. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists ACOG. Immersion in water duringlabor and delivery. Committee Opinion No. 594. Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 123(4): 912-5. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-3794.

  • 55. Neiman E, Austin E, Tan A, Anderson CM, Chipps E. Outcomes of waterbirth in a UShospital-based midwifery practice: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Water Immersion DuringLabor and Birth. Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health. 2020; 65(2):216–23. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13033.

  • 56. Lewis L, Hauck YL, Butt J, Western C, Overing H, Poletti C, et al. Midwives’ experienceof their education, knowledge and practice around immersion in water for labour or birth. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2018;18(1): 249. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1823-0.

  • 57. Cooper M, Warland J, McCutcheon H. Australian midwives views and experiences ofpractice and politics related to water immersion for labour and birth: A web based survey. Women and Birth. 2018; 31(3):184–93. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.09.001.

  • 58. Wright Jr. KP, McHill AW, Birks BR, Griffin BR, Rusterholz T, Chinoy ED. Entrainmentof the human circadian clock to the natural light-dark cycle. Current Biology. 2013; 23(16). 1554-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.06.039.

  • 59. Ergenoğlu AS, Aytuğ A. Sağlık kurumlarında değişen paradigmalar ve iyileştiren hastanekavramının tasarım açısından irdelenmesi. Megaron- Y.T.Ü. Mim. Fak. Dergisi. 2007; 2(1):44-63. Available from: https://app.trdizin.gov.tr/makale/TnpReE1UTXo/saglik-kurumlarinda-degisen-paradigmalar-ve-iyilestiren-hastane-kavraminin-mimari-tasarimacisindan-irdelenmesi60. Lothian JA. Do not disturb: the importance of privacy in labor. The Journal of perinatal education. 2004; 13(3):4–6. doi: 10.1624/105812404X1707.

  • 61. Wrønding T, Argyraki A, Petersen JF, Topsøe MF, Petersen PM, Løkkegaard ECL. Theaesthetic nature of the birthing room environment may alter the need for obstetricalinterventions – an observational retrospective cohort study. 2019; 9(1): 1-7. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-36416-x.

  • 62. Rodrigues LSP, Shimo AKK. Low light in delivery room: obstetric nursing’s experiences.Revista gaucha de enfermagem. 2019; 40: e20180464. doi: 10.1590/1983- 1447.2019.20180464.

  • 63. Jensen KR, Hvidman L, Kierkegaard O, Gliese H, Manser T, Uldbjerg N, et al. Noise as arisk factor in the delivery room: A clinical study. PloS one. 2019; 14(8): e0221860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221860.

  • 64. Fredriksson S, Hammar O, Torén K, Waye KP, Tenenbaum A. The effect of occupationalnoise exposure on tinnitus and sound-induced auditory fatigue among obstetrics personnel: Across-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2015; 5(3): e005793. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005793.65. Łozińska-Czerniak A, Salamończyk M, Dmoch-Gajzlerska E, Magdalena B. Analysis ofthe sound environment and the sound level in the delivery room in the first hour of a newborn’slife. Journal of Mother and Child. 2020; 24(1):33–8. doi: 10.34763/jmotherandchild.2020241.1927.000006.

  • 66. Pirdel M, Pirdel L. Perceived environmental stressors and pain perception during laboramong primiparous and multiparous women. Journal of Reproduction & Infertility. 2009; 10(3):217–23. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3719331/

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics